Monday - Friday: 9:30am - 5:30pm
ninja-forms
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/vhosts/josiah-lakegardiner.com/httpdocs/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114Monday - Friday: 9:30am - 5:30pm
David acted for a very successful female executive (W) in financial remedy proceedings at the Central Family Court whose husband (H) had chosen to give up work as he ‘wanted to take a career break’. Facts/Issues. W who was aged 45 was a senior partner in a successful business earning a large six figure salary.… Continue reading Do I still get Half even if I do Nothing?
David acted for a very successful female executive (W) in financial remedy proceedings at the Central Family Court whose husband (H) had chosen to give up work as he ‘wanted to take a career break’.
Facts/Issues.
W who was aged 45 was a senior partner in a successful business earning a large six figure salary. H who was also aged 45 had, by the time W instructed David, been unemployed since giving up work without agreement from or consultation with W some 3 years previously. He was a bit of a ‘bully’. No prizes for guessing the reason for the tension in the marriage and the subsequent decision by W to divorce H.
Theirs was a 20 year relationship (17 of which as a married couple).
Both parties continued to live at the family home, a London property worth in excess of £1.35m.
Their three children were aged 12, 10 and 6. H claimed to be their primary carer by virtue of his decision to give up work. In reality W remained their primary carer, despite an exhausting work schedule.
H sought a child arrangements order providing for the children to spend equal time with each of the parents.
He sought a larger than one half share of the sale proceeds of the family home, half of W’s pensions and substantial maintenance.
Unsurprisingly, this was not agreed.
Outcome/Judge’s order
After a hearing before a High Court Judge, it was decided that the children would continue to live with W and to have limited contact with H (one overnight per fortnight).
H was awarded ZERO maintenance and NO share of W’s pension assets.
H was though given £500k in return for the transfer of his interest in the family home to W.
Do contact David at david@j-lg.com to find out how he can help you