Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the ninja-forms domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/vhosts/josiah-lakegardiner.com/httpdocs/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114
City Trader “Must I share my bonus for ever?” | Josiah-Lake Gardiner City Trader “Must I share my bonus for ever?” – Josiah-Lake Gardiner

City Trader “Must I share my bonus for ever?”

This particular case study may be of interest to you if you are a city trader or the spouse of a city trader. Facts/Issues. The husband (H) in this case is an Oil Broker aged 48 years; his wife (W) is aged 50 and is currently not working but training to be a therapist. There… Continue reading City Trader “Must I share my bonus for ever?”

This particular case study may be of interest to you if you are a city trader or the spouse of a city trader.

Facts/Issues.

The husband (H) in this case is an Oil Broker aged 48 years; his wife (W) is aged 50 and is currently not working but training to be a therapist. There are four children of the family, 2 at university and twins aged 10.

The parties had been married for over 15 years.  H’s net income, including bonuses, amounted to £286k (£138k net excluding bonuses) in the latest financial year; past years over £500k net. The assets schedule was agreed at £1.95m plus pensions of c.£500k.

W proposed a 71% split in her favour, on a deferred basis, even though this would deprive H of his capital for many years, leaving him needing a substantial mortgage. She also sought maintenance of £138k per annum fixed, being the equivalent of all of H’s basic net income, for life. i.e. a guaranteed minimum payment in respect of H’s non-guaranteed bonuses.

Rebecca managed to negotiate for H that W would receive just over 50% of the capital, divided now and maintenance including child support of £68k net per annum plus 20% of H’s bonus capped at £24k until the youngest child reached 21 as opposed to a life time maintenance order for W.

The treatment of bonuses will be of interest to those working in the city or wives of city traders, Rebecca’s argument that to the extent that the maintenance order cannot fairly be met from the husband’s basic income, the structure of the order must reflect the structure of the husband’s income, and that part that is referable to bonus will be subject to a cap.

Contact us now to see if we can help you.

How can we help?